We publish the comment of the
Fraction of the International Communist
Left and want to indicate our whole internationalist solidarity with comrades of
the Pcint-Battaglia Communista.
Internationalist Communists - Klasbatalo
Solidarity
with Battaglia Comunista (PCint)
which has suffered provocations in Parma (Italy)
We publish here the
"communique" that the comrades of the PCint-Battaglia Comunista (Internationalist Communist Tendency) have written
after various and suspicious provocations recently held against them. We think
highly important that all groups and militants claiming the Communist Left
legacy express their solidarity with BC and the ICT. This expression of solidarity is obvious, by principle
can we say, and must be expressed at any moment. But today, it seems to us that
it is even more fundamental at the very moment the confrontation between the
classes, between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, takes a wider scale than
the last decades because the deepness and the impasse of capitalism's
economical crisis. Everywhere, the bourgeoisie is obliged to attack massively
and roughly the working class. Everywhere, it knows that these attacks will
provoke inescapably workers reactions – they have already begun - which
will be massive and increasingly "radical". It does prepare itself to
it. Economically of course, but above all politically, ideologically, and at
the repressive level too.
In Italy, the bourgeoisie has a
great experience of the confrontation and the repression with the proletariat.
In the years 1970, in front of the social movements initiated by the 1969
Italian "May" [called "Mai rampant" in French since it
occurred during various months in the 1969 spring a year after the French
May 68, translator's note], one of its essential weapons for derailing the
proletariat off its class ground and to defeat it, had been the utilization of
the police provocations and the cynical and systematic use of terrorism
- through murderous bombings of so-called anarchists and in which the
secrete services and policemen were often implicated as well as they were not
very far from the terrorist actions realized by the Red Brigades... It appears today that the Italian bourgeoisie
takes out again from its drawers this arm and this tactic putting back at first
plan alleged threats of "violent" groups and various bombings and
murders, one day on behalf of the mafia, the other one of the anarchists (FAI),
the third on a "madman". So, it creates a "climate of
tension" that the BC comrades underline and denounce in their communique
and which does not limit itself to national scale events but also to a lot of
local "incidents"... as in Parma where some of them have been
provoked but "fascist" elements. It is in this context of "tension"
that the PCint office in Parma has been "visited".
This tactic of tension has only
one aim : hampering the inescapable revival of the workers struggles and
the indispensable workers fight-back to the attacks they suffer ; and, for
that aim, also attacking the political groups and militants of the class'
vanguard who call for the destruction of the bourgeois State and for the
Dictatorship of the proletariat. The utilization of terrorism enables to create
the suspicion of these ones, to take the workers away from them, and to prepare
thus their repression, their prosecution and their banning. The communists, as
their class, have nothing to do with terrorism and they firmly denounce its use
and "minority" actions which substitute to the mass action of the
proletariat. Following the communique of the ICT comrades, we reproduce an
extract of the Resolution on terrorism, terror
and class violence – that we
had adopted in the ICC in 1978 – which recalls why terrorism can't be a
proletariat's arm and why it can't be today but utilized, manipulated, and even
directly created by the bourgeoisie and its State. In front of these
provocations which will certainly multiply, we claim the conclusion of the
PCint comrades : "that's why we will carry on our communist
fight and will defend our capacity of political action without withdrawing for
one step".
Solidarity with the comrades
of Battaglia Comunista !
The FICL, May 30th, 2012.
Communique
of Battaglia Comunista
Serious
Event at the Parma PCint Office.
During the night of Wednesday 16
to Thursday 17, unknown persons have get into our office in Parma, at borgo
San Giuseppe 5, and have taken tens of
volumes of the Dimitri Papaioannoy library. The following Friday morning, one
comrade passing to the office found the mailbox pulled out and thrown in front
of the door.
Facts as well worrying had
already occurred in the previous weeks : one day, we realized that one of
the two banners that we run up at the office entrance when we open it, had
disappeared ; some days later, we found the other banner on the ground
with a footprint on it.
It is obvious that these unknown
persons have been able to open the door without breaking. We can't know who are
the authors of these provocations towards us but they fit in a climate of tension
which have not stop growing in the city after the criminal attack that the
fascists of the Casapound have led with
strikes of iron bars and knives Saturday May 11th afternoon against
comrades of the anti-fascist committee of the Montanara district.
In these cases, we need to have
solid nerves and much determination. As far as we are concerned, we won't let
us being intimidated by anyone - as communists, we know that the
bourgeoisie's hand is behind these provocations -, and we won't fall in
the trap of the physical fight-back - it is exactly what the enemy class
looks for. That's why we will carry on our communist fight and will defend our
capacity of political action without withdrawing for one step
Battaglia Comunista, section "Guido Torricelli" of Parma.
Sunday, May 27th 2012.
(Translated into English by
the FICL)
Resolution
on terror, terrorism and class violence
(extracts,
ICC, 1978)
We reproduce here after an
extract of a programmatic document of the ICC which presents the communists'
position in regards with the question of terrorism and which we carry on still
today to defend as ours.
(...)
4. Capitalism is the last society
in history to be divided into classes. The capitalist class bases its rule on
the economic exploitation of the working class. In order to ensure this
exploitation and intensify it as far as it can, the capitalist class, like all
exploiting classes in history, resorts to all the means of coercion, oppression
and repression at its disposal. It does not hesitate to use the most inhuman,
savage and bloody methods to guarantee and perpetuate exploitation. The more it
is confronted with internal difficulties, the more the workers resist
exploitation, the more bloodily the bourgeoisie exerts its repression. It has
developed a whole arsenal of repressive methods: prisons, deportations, murder,
concentration camps, genocidal wars, and the most refined forms of torture. It
has also, of necessity, created various bodies specialized in carrying all this
out: police; gendarmes, armies, juridical bodies, qualified torturers,
commandos and paramilitary gangs. The capitalist class devotes an ever-growing
part of the surplus value extracted from the exploitation of the working class
in order to maintain this repressive apparatus; this has reached the point
where this sector has become the most important and flourishing field of social
activity. In order to defend its class rule, the capitalist class is in the
process of leading society to ruin and threatening the whole of humanity with
suffering and death.
We are not trying to paint an
emotional picture of capitalist barbarism; it is a prosaic description of its
actual practice.
This practice, which impregnates
the whole of social life and all relations between human beings, which
penetrates into the pores of society, this practice, this system of domination,
we call -- terror. Terror is not this or that episodic, circumstantial act of
violence. Terror is a particular mode of violence, inherent to exploiting
classes. It is concentrated, organized, specialized violence, planned,
developed and perfected with the aim of perpetuating exploitation.
Its principal characteristics
are:
a. being the violence of a
minority class against the great majority of society;
b. perpetuating and perfecting
itself to the point of becoming its own raison d’être;
c. requiring a specialized body
which always becomes more specialized, more detached from society, closed in
upon itself, escaping all control, brutally imposing its iron grip on the whole
population and stifling any hint of criticism with the silence of death.
5. The proletariat is not the
only class to feel the rigors of state terror. Terror is also imposed upon all
the petty bourgeois classes and strata: peasants, artisans, small producers and
shopkeepers, intellectuals and the liberal professions, scientists and
students; it even extends itself into the ranks of the bourgeois class itself.
These strata and classes do not put forward any historical alternative to
capitalism; worn out and exasperated by the barbarism of the system and its
terror, they can only oppose it with acts of despair: terrorism.
Although it can also be used by
certain sectors of the bourgeoisie, terrorism is essentially the mode of
action, the practice of desperate
classes and strata who have no future. This is why this practice, which tries to be ‘heroic and exemplary’, is in
fact nothing but an act of suicide. It offers no way forward and only has the
result of supplying victims to the terror of the state. It has no positive
effect on the class struggle of the proletariat and often acts as an obstacle
to it, inasmuch as it gives rise to illusions among the workers that there can
be some other way forward than the class struggle. This is why terrorism, the
practice of the petty bourgeoisie, can be
and often is exploited judiciously by the state as a way of derailing the
workers from the terrain of the class struggle and as a pretext for
strengthening the terror of the state.
What characterizes terrorism as a
practice of the petty bourgeoisie is the fact that it is the action of small,
isolated minorities which never raises itself to the level of mass action. It
is conducted in the shadows of little conspiracies, thus providing a favorite
hunting ground for the underhand activities of agents of the police and the
state and for all sorts of manipulations and intrigues. (...)
In this sense we have to reject
the idea of a ‘workers’ terrorism’ which is presented as the work of
detachments of the proletariat, ‘specialists’ in armed action, or which is
supposed to prepare the ground for future battles by giving an example of
violent struggle to the rest of the class, or by ‘weakening’ the capitalist
state by ‘preliminary attacks’. The proletariat can delegate certain
detachments for this or that immediate action (pickets, patrols, etc) but these
are under the control of the movement as a whole; within the framework of this
movement the resolute actions of the most advanced elements can serve to
catalyze the struggle of the broad masses, but this can never be done through
the conspiratorial and individualistic methods that characterize terrorism.
Terrorism even when practiced by workers or groups of workers, cannot take on a
proletarian character, just as the fact that the unions are made up of workers
does not make them organs of the working class. (...)
6) (...)
The struggle of the proletariat,
like any social struggle, is necessarily violent, but the practice of its
violence is as distinct from that of other classes as are its projects and its
goals. Its practice, including the use of violence, is the action of huge
masses, not of a minority; it is liberating, the midwife of a new harmonious
society, not the perpetuation of a permanent state of war of one against all
and all against one. Its practice does not aim to perfect and perpetuate
violence, but to banish the crimes of the capitalist class and immobilize it.
(...)
Its invincible force resides
(...) in its capacity to mobilize the whole mass of the class and to integrate
the majority of the non-proletarian laboring classes and strata into the
struggle against capitalist barbarism. It resides in the development of its
consciousness and its capacity to organize itself in a unified autonomous way,
in the firmness of its convictions and the vigor of its decisions.
These are the fundamental weapons
of the practice, the class violence of the proletariat.
ICC, International Review 15, 1978.
No comments:
Post a Comment